My writing has become a habit
now. Whether it is good or not I do not know, since I have no idea if the ‘followers’
are reading my articles.
I have requested all of them to
read. But actual reading has to be done by them! I can drag a horse to water,
but to make it drink, the horse has to be thirty or my ‘article food’ must be
tasty enough!
Why this question came into my
mind today? It is because my non-fiction pages are getting filled; but the
fiction is really limping. It is not that I do not have the ideas. I have it in
plenty. I have to whole story in my mind. Only I am groping to get the right
words to be put in the right place.
The time frame is removed from my
novel. That means I can write anything I want (and get away with it!). A reader
is supposed to be more intelligent than the writer. Or at least the writer
should feel that way. Then the story would go in the right manner.
I remember my Jeevanmukhi novel,
which I still consider as my best till now. The plot, the style, the
characterisation … all looked perfect.
I also had this suspense element which
gets open only in the last few lines of the novel, is something a reader
cherishes. I have given clues in the novel in such a way that the reader feels ‘ha-ha,
I have caught the author on the wrong foot. He thinks that he has written a
suspense point. Unfortunately I have already guessed what he has tried to hide’
I am my own first reader. If I feel
I can’t understand or can’t correlate with what has been written by me, I will
immediately change the idea. If I can’t change the idea, then the story is
gone.
I have a few plots developed up
to almost 40 pages and left unfinished. The punch is missing in those novels. You
may call them ha-baked. I wish they were like the base of a pizza which you can
bring home, add the ingredients and convert it into a mouth slurping pizza.
But come to think of it…. We can’t
please the whole fraternity. There are people who are never satisfied with
whatever been served to them.
I remember the reviews which came
for my novel Jeevamukhi in the weekly magazine Sudha. They had published almost
20 reviews. Most the reviews were very inspiring. They made me feel happy. Most
of them had identified the theme; they had understood what I had tried to tell
in the novel. They had expressed their happiness for giving them such a good
novel.
But there were two reviews which I relish. One of them had
written that ‘the author has given stuff of novels in one novel’. I remember I had
written the same review to another magazine when my favourite authoress had written
a novel! To get the same review for my novel made me feel as if this was a
poetic justiceJ
But the other one takes the cake. The reader had written like this: A very
ordinary subject with very ordinary characters. The novelist has written this
in a very ordinary way for 22 weeks. This was a boring novel.
Wow, a good review at last, I thought. I only wondered how
the reader could have gone through the novel week after week cursing and
finally decided to share the feelings by writing a candid review.
See, this is what I said about we can’t please them all.
Importantly, a novel or any writing should have a very good
character – readability.
No comments:
Post a Comment